When a Judge or Jury analyze a case where a medical issue is central, they rely on a medical expert witness, often a doctor, to help them understand it.

A medical expert should be neutral, and merely help the Court understand the issue.

However, some medical experts view themselves as a “hired gun,” confusing expert testimony with advocacy, and believing they can bluff their way through Cross Examination.

But it’s a lot harder to bluff when the cross-examining attorney is also a practicing physician.